While there are still some uncertainties, it looks like I have at least identified the mountain range in question.
The current plan is to split my time between teaching and researching in Tallinn University of Technology (Estonia) and University of Jyväskylä (Finland), with 25% of my time left for various projects that I can pursue in self-employed mode (ideas welcome). The switch is going to happen in the next few months and should be complete by the end of the year.
I will still focus on cyber conflict and national cyber security research, so that is not going to change. However, I hope to tie my current research with a different field or approach, such as AI or situational awareness, in order to cover interesting new ground. I am not set on a topic yet and will explore cooperation opportunities as they develop.
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Time to climb a new mountain
After four years as a Scientist at the NATO CCD COE, which was preceded by another three years of work helping set up and develop the Centre, the time has finally come to move on to face new challenges. Or to be a bit more specific, this time will come sometime in the second half of 2012.
I feel I am ready to explore cyber security and cyber conflict from new angles. I love teaching, so an academic approach is definitely a possibility. It would also be interesting to gain experience from private sector perspective. Most likely I will try to combine various options to get the "perfect blend" for the time being. By the look of things I will make my decision later this month.
I can't say for sure what road I will follow, but one thing I definitely want to do is to revive this blog. I have been very busy (personally, academically, professionally) for the past couple of years and, sadly, this blog was one of the easiest things to put on hold while I got things sorted out. Yet, people still seem to find it every once in a while, as the visit counter passed ten thousand last month. This adds to my motivation to get things going again.
Time to re-invent myself...
I feel I am ready to explore cyber security and cyber conflict from new angles. I love teaching, so an academic approach is definitely a possibility. It would also be interesting to gain experience from private sector perspective. Most likely I will try to combine various options to get the "perfect blend" for the time being. By the look of things I will make my decision later this month.
I can't say for sure what road I will follow, but one thing I definitely want to do is to revive this blog. I have been very busy (personally, academically, professionally) for the past couple of years and, sadly, this blog was one of the easiest things to put on hold while I got things sorted out. Yet, people still seem to find it every once in a while, as the visit counter passed ten thousand last month. This adds to my motivation to get things going again.
Time to re-invent myself...
Labels:
academia,
CCD COE,
cyber conflict,
cyber security
Thursday, November 10, 2011
CFP for CyCon 2012
The CFP for the fourth International Conference on Cyber Conflict is out. As has been the tradition so far, the conference title has changed yet again - the short version is now CyCon.
Mark your calendars - I hope to see you in Tallinn in June!
Mark your calendars - I hope to see you in Tallinn in June!
Labels:
CCD COE,
CFP,
conference,
cyber conflict,
LoAC
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
DDoS - a legitimate form of protest?
The cyber attacks against supporters and opponents of Wikileaks have generated a fair bit of debate about whether or not DDoS can be a legitimate form of protest. I tend to side with the "nays" on this one.
Sure, DDoS could be compared to a sit in, but with infinitely lower entry threshold. One does not need to travel anywhere, or actually waste their time "sitting", and very often does not risk dealing with law enforcement - the computer can protest on their behalf all night long. It's more like throwing nails on a freeway and going home.
But my main argument against protest DDoS is that it can then be used for any cause. Attacks against Radio Free Europe? It's cool, they just protestin'! As can be seen from the Wikileaks affair, both sides in there are using cyber attacks to get their message across. Is this truly what we want? I dont like you, so I have the right to DDoS you? I have the right for free speech and the right for making stupid people shut up?
Sure, DDoS could be compared to a sit in, but with infinitely lower entry threshold. One does not need to travel anywhere, or actually waste their time "sitting", and very often does not risk dealing with law enforcement - the computer can protest on their behalf all night long. It's more like throwing nails on a freeway and going home.
But my main argument against protest DDoS is that it can then be used for any cause. Attacks against Radio Free Europe? It's cool, they just protestin'! As can be seen from the Wikileaks affair, both sides in there are using cyber attacks to get their message across. Is this truly what we want? I dont like you, so I have the right to DDoS you? I have the right for free speech and the right for making stupid people shut up?
Labels:
cyber attack,
cyber conflict,
cyber militia,
DDoS,
hactivism
Friday, November 19, 2010
Cyber Security Conference in Georgia
I was in Tbilisi last week and spoke at the Georgian Cyber Security and IT Innovation conference. The first day focused solely on cyber security topics. Agenda and materials are available here. As expected, the 2008 Russia-Georgia war and its cyber component came up in several presentations.
My talk on Volunteers in Cyber Conflict was based on a number of papers I have written on the subject. While I have focused on the offensive (and illegal) hactivism/patriotic hacking so far, I am in the process of switching gears and focusing on the defencive (and official) use of volunteers. For example, the reserve cyber units in US military, the WARP system in UK and the Cyber Defence League in Estonia. I believe there is great merit in harnessing the skills and resources of security specialists and enthusiasts for a constructive purpose.
My talk on Volunteers in Cyber Conflict was based on a number of papers I have written on the subject. While I have focused on the offensive (and illegal) hactivism/patriotic hacking so far, I am in the process of switching gears and focusing on the defencive (and official) use of volunteers. For example, the reserve cyber units in US military, the WARP system in UK and the Cyber Defence League in Estonia. I believe there is great merit in harnessing the skills and resources of security specialists and enthusiasts for a constructive purpose.
Labels:
conference,
cyber conflict,
cyber defence,
cyber forces,
cyber militia,
cyber war,
Georgia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)